Printing Press Manufacturers’ Motions for Summary Judgment Denied

Start
Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County (NYCAL) – In this asbestos action, defendants L3Harris Technologies Inc. and Heidelberg USA Inc. moved separately for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff Raymond Desiena did not establish exposure to asbestos from his work on Harris or Heidelberg-branded printing presses during his work as a printing press operator from the 1960s-1980s….
By: Goldberg Segalla
Previous Story

Navvis & Company Reports Data Breach Affecting Patients of Certain Healthcare Providers

Next Story

TechRadar’s Cyber Predictions for 2024 are Spot On