Pennsylvania Supreme Court Held that When Plaintiff Fails to Meet the Burden of Demonstrating Good Faith Effort in Diligently and Timely Serving Process, then Actual Notice of the Lawsuit Is Irrelevant

Start
Ferraro v. Patterson-Erie Corp., 313 A.3d 987 (Pa. April 25, 2024) – In deciding whether a complaint served after expiration of the applicable statute of limitations period was time-barred, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania applied the reasoning from Gussom v. Teagle, 247 A.3d 1046 (Pa. 2021). When there is a factual dispute as to whether a plaintiff fulfilled the duty to make a good faith effort in diligently and timely serving process on a defendant, a plaintiff has the evidentiary burden to…
By: Marshall Dennehey
Previous Story

2023-2024 Annual Review of the Fifth Circuit’s Judicial Statistics

Next Story

Superior Court of Pennsylvania Held that Landowner Was Not Relieved of Its Duty of Care for Open and Obvious Dangers When It Should Have Expected a Business Invitee to Be Distracted