Minnesota Seeks Comment on Rules Implementing Reporting Requirement for Products Containing Intentionally Added PFAS and Associated Fees

Start
Following up on the rulemaking process presaged by Minnesota’s comprehensive statute (Amara’s Law) requiring phase outs of PFAS intentionally added to products, which we’ve previously discussed here and here, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued a new request for comments that consolidates two separate earlier requests for comments on proposed reporting requirements and proposed fees authorized by the statute….
By: Fox Rothschild LLP
Previous Story

The Hidden Dangers of Florida’s Scenic Routes: When a Beautiful Drive Turns into a Liability Nightmare

Next Story

New York Court Denies in Part, Grants in Part Talc Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment