Circuit Split: 3rd vs 9th & 11th Circuits on FIFRA Duty to Warn Claims

Start
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Schaffner v. Monsanto, No. 22-3075 (3rd Cir. 2024), recently held that a state-law duty to warn claim was expressly preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). To reach the conclusion, the 3rd Circuit diverged from the 9th and 11th Circuits, thus creating a split between circuits and providing an opportunity for the United States Supreme Court to step in and make a definitive ruling on FIFRA…
By: Husch Blackwell LLP
Previous Story

Sophos Firewall hardening best practices

Next Story

Gándara Mental Health Center Provides Notice of Recent Data Breach