California Supreme Court Walks Middle Ground on Warnings Causation but Reaffirms Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Himes

Start
As we reported in April, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified a question on California’s Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Himes v. Somatics, LLC, 2022 WL 989469 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022). The California Supreme Court has now decided the issue in a way that walks the middle ground. On the one hand, the court rejected plaintiff’s call for recognizing an exception to the learned intermediary rule and reaffirmed the basic rule that a manufacturer’s duty to warn runs to…
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Previous Story

Data Breach at Infosys McCamish Systems Leaks Information of Nassau Life & Annuity Company Customers

Next Story

Motion for Summary Judgment Denied on Issue of Proximate Cause