Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions

Start
In Incept v. Palette Life Sciences 21-2063, 21-2065 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2023), the case addresses the Board’s anticipation and obviousness determinations in two IPRs (IPR2020-00002 and IPR2020-00004), where the Board held the claims in the challenged patents unpatentable as anticipated by, or obvious in view of, the asserted prior art….
By: Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Previous Story

Xybion Corporation Files Official Notice of Data Breach Involving Consumers’ Social Security Numbers

Next Story

FTC Proposes Major Updates to Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act