AI Expert’s Report Deemed Unreliable Due to “Hallucinations” Within

“The irony.” So wrote federal district judge Laura M. Provinzino when she rejected as unreliable an artificial intelligence expert’s report that was found to have contained three non-existent, AI-generated citations. The “irony” here was supplied by the fact the expert’s expertise is on AI’s capacity to mislead, and the case itself involved a First Amendment challenge to a Minnesota law forbidding the dissemination of so-called “deepfakes” with the intent to injure a political candidate or…
By: Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC