Middle District Upholds Regular Use Exclusion in the Wake of Rush and Takes One Step Further

Start
Dayton v. The Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford, Connecticut, 2024 WL 1745041 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2024) – Datyon was injured while operating his employer’s vehicle and subsequently submitted a claim for underinsured motorist benefits to his personal auto insurer, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, which denied his claim based upon the regular use exclusion in the UIM policy….
By: Marshall Dennehey
Previous Story

European Union Adopts the New Product Liability Directive

Next Story

Leveraging AI in Business: Legal Implications and Best Practices